Tag Archives: Power Stroke

In the first part of this story we had talked about how the Americans wanted everything to be big so that they could have their bragging rights.  The same was the case for motorcycles as well.  The original icon of American motorcycling has always been Harley – Davidson.  When the Japanese went there, they found that the Harley riders were outcastes.  They gave themselves horrible sobriquets like Hell’s Angels and rode in big groups and vandalized everything on the way.  They gave motorcycling a bad name.  Honda rectified it with the “Only the nicest people ride a Honda” campaign with the launch of its Super Cub.  However, while the Americans were willing to consider that even nice people rode motorcycles they were not exactly happy with the size of the Cub.  So to sustain, big motorcycles were needed, but they also had to be different from the big Harleys for obvious reasons.

Harley Davidsons  were to Americans then, what Royal Enfield Bullets are to Indians now.  They were huge and were modified disgustingly with long kicked out front forks and had saddle bags and V twin engines that sounded glorious but leaked oil, broke down frequently and were a pain to maintain.  The technology used was the ancient push rod engine technology.  In management terms there is a concept called “Opportunity to See” and the Japanese ever the opportunists did not lose this opportunity, so they went to America and conquered it.  Their bikes were everything that the Harleys were not.  They were packed with new technology, were very reliable and most importantly they went very fast and consumed relatively less fuel.  Kawasaki saw another opportunity here, they wanted to do things differently.  So they made bikes such as the mad Mach3, called thus because it featured three cylinders in line and went super fast.  It also was a two stroke motorcycle that consumed everything that stood in its wake.  The Mach3 was not without its problems.  The middle cylinder did not cool too efficiently because it was in a sandwich and Kawasaki initially found solutions by changing the angle of banking of the cylinders.  But something more radical was required if the in line cylinders were to be cool and efficient.  So enter liquid cooling.  Kawasaki was not the inventor of liquid cooling but they put it to innovative use.

Kawasaki saw that the Americans had a penchant to do things differently.  So they were asking for pollution limits to be brought down and balmy California was at the forefront of this.  California has always been an important market for motorcycles and the clue to that lay in the weather.  Unlike Europe which was had inclement weather for most of the year, California and some other states in the US had nice weather with temperatures hovering in the eighty degrees Fahrenheit range.  The USA has always been the citadel of marketing.  You could sell anything, absolutely anything if that thing was packaged very well.  The Japanese being who they were again saw an opportunity.  Package their bikes well and the Americans would buy them in droves.  So Honda and Kawasaki upped the ante with technology.  They shifted to four strokes but their motorcycles were most unlike the Harleys that the Americans were used to.  Instead of V twin configurations, Honda went for V4 configurations while Kawasaki went for in line four cylinder configurations.  But the biggest difference was not so much in the engine as it was in the chassis.

The usual topography of America and especially that of California is long flat lands that had long straight roads that went on and on.  So typically bikes were made with no respect whatsoever for handling.  Seriously, what great handling do you require to keep going in a straight line for ever?  Europe was different and had Grand Prix racing on tracks that were twisting and turning.  Honda, the most ambitious among the Japanese wanted to conquer GP racing which was dominated mainly by British and Italian motorcycles.  GP racing taught Honda the importance of a light weight motorcycle with a chassis that could enable the rider to turn the motorcycle without losing time or balance.  The Japanese saw that the Americans raced their cars (mainly drag racing) and a bit of bikes as well.  They took the next big thing to America, circuit racing and the “race on Sunday and sell on Monday” adage took shape.  Kawasaki stole a march over the others here by creating a tractable motor in a wonderful chassis which made for a sure fire winner.  Thus the nomenclature GPz was born.  The first GPz was a 900cc and it became a hit with the Americans.

Now came the time to convert this hit into a marketing success as well.  The marketing savvy Americans wanted a name that was catchy, something that everyone could relate to.  In this meanwhile the GPz was being called the Z1 and till day it is considered to be the world’s first Superbike. The Americans told the Kawasaki factory that the ideal name for the Kawasaki super bike would be Ninja, the stealthy, quick, nimble and efficient martial artist.  Kawasaki liked it, after all it came from native Japan, from the practitioners of the martial art of Ninjutsu.  So they agreed and the name stuck, for good.  In America for a while Ninja became a generic name for a super bike like Xerox for a copier machine.

This was a good and a bad thing for Kawasaki.  It was good that their product name became synonymous with a category of motorcycle but really bad because every other Japanese super bike was also being called a Ninja.  That somehow seemed to dilute their achievement.  Sometimes too much success can work against you.  That is what happened to Kawasaki.  So it needed to do something and really quick.  Kawasaki had a liking for the letter Z.  That is why they introduced it along with the GP moniker as GPz.  So henceforth they decided to prefix their Ninja motorcycles with ZX and a number that denoted the cubic capacity of the motorcycle.  Thus was born the nomenclature of ZX-6, ZX-7, ZX-9, ZX-10 and later the ZX-11 (which was essentially an upgraded ZX-10) and finally what is considered to be the greatest Superbike and Kawasaki ever, the ZX-12.  In the United States there is today a ZX-14 as well, but that is something we shall come to soon.  The no.6 denoted a 600cc, the no.7 denoted 750cc, the no.9 denoted 900cc, 10 denoted 1000cc and when the engine went over 1000cc it became 11.  Somewhere Suzuki had decided to threaten Kawasaki with the Hayabusa and to take it head on the ZX-12 was created.

Kawasaki spread its wings to Europe as well and there they made sure that the Ninja moniker would be used in conjunction with the ZX moniker which meant that the motorcycle was a racer and so the suffix of R also was used.  So the nomenclature in Europe even today is Kawasaki ZX-10 R Ninja.  In the middle however Kawasaki found that they had to upgrade their 600cc with a shorter stroke engine and so gave it the nomenclature of ZX-6RR Ninja.  But that was a one off thing.  In Europe where greater significance is attached to taxonomy Kawasaki began using the ZZ-R nomenclature for bikes that were less sporty and more for touring.  So what is called the Ninja 250 R in India today started life in Europe as Kawasaki ZZ-R 250 and there were ZZ-R motorcycles of 750, 1000 and 1200 cc.  These were NOT Ninjas and that tradition continues till today.

In the meanwhile the changing of market conditions essentially meant that Kawasaki had started cutting down on the number of motorcycle platforms.  In racing, the 750 cc category became redundant and so the ZX7 no longer exists.  Since World Superbikes now has 1000cc for four cylinder engines, the ZX-10 R Ninja was reborn.  The ZX-12 R was put rest a few years ago.  So in Europe the Kawasaki Ninjas are strictly the ZX-6R that races in the Supersports category and the ZX-10R that races in the Superbikes category.  The Suzuki Hayabusa though very fast was never a track tool and a few years back Kawasaki launched the ZZ-R 1400 which for the first time incorporated a monocoque chassis and along with the Hayabusa sits in the sports tourer category.  Kawasaki created a for every day use a motorcycle called the ER-6n and a variant called the ER-6f.  The ER is for every day/every one, the 6 for 650 cc, the n for naked and f for faired.  So what we now get in India and the bike that launched this story, the Ninja 650 R is actually the ER-6f in Europe.

Back home in America, like in India the ER-6f became a Ninja and so received the nomenclature of Ninja 650 – R while the naked bike still goes with the ER-6n name.  In the meanwhile the ZZ-R 250 also gained the Ninja tag and became the Ninja 250 R.  So now within the Ninja category there are two types.  Kawasaki calls the non ZX Ninjas, Sports machines in the USA and the ZX Ninjas, Super Sports.  When it decided to make its 250cc bike the entry level Kawasaki globally it became a Ninja even in Europe but without the ZX prefix.  The Ninja 650 R is again a marketing strategy that works in the USA but not in Europe.  The Americans want something in the nature of a super bike so there is the Ninja 650 R as also a Ninja 1000 which is a faired version of the Z 1000.  In markets such as as Thailand and India, Kawasaki is now following the American nomenclature and so the 650 became the Ninja 650 R.  The next bike will probably be the Ninja 1000 and not the ZX-10R Ninja which would be much more expensive.  In India and Thailand getting a big bike with the Ninja name is great, people are not fastidious like the Europeans who insist on proper taxonomy.  So the marketing teams have been selling the non cutting edge bikes as Ninjas just as they do in America.  In fact, since the Ninja 250 R and the 650 R that are sold here are of European specifications they get fuel injection, while the Americans still do with carburetors on their bikes.

Thus dear friends ends the Ninja story for now.  We request you to now keep a couple of things in mind.  The first is that in the narration for the sake of continuity we have not talked of some models that came in and went.  We also did not talk about other existing Kawasaki models such as the Versys, the Concourse etc because this is a Ninja story only. We would also like you to remember that the reality of the Japanese market is slightly different.  At one time Kawasaki even made scooters and 50cc pocket rockets.  In Japan for Kawasaki it is a completely different ball game altogether, something that we also do not know fully about and hence will not comment on.  Thank you for reading, hope you enjoyed the ride down history lane.  Please do comment, it will be hugely appreciated.

Motoring journos the world over have a habit (we will leave it to you to decide whether it is a good one or a bad one); when a product is launched they will beat the hell out of it till people are finally tired of it.  Please don’t misunderstand.  Even praising a product endlessly constitutes beating the hell out of it, so there is no escaping that really.  We are a humble website, just a couple of months old and most manufacturers (Yamaha excepted) have yet to acknowledge our presence.  So under the circumstances, what are our chances of getting invited to the launch of new products?  Minus whatever number comes to your mind.  But then you see we also like to think of ourselves as proper motor journos and therefore we too have the compulsive urge to do  a product or a name into the ground, but you the good reader can see the problem; where is the product?  At Riot Engine we like to think of ourselves as intelligent and resourceful people (please do indulge us in our delusion) and so we have decided to start the process of beating the hell out of a name.  Till yesterday the preferred name that has been on the tip of the tongues and fingers of motorcycle journos has been CBR.  Automobile mags (both in their digital and printed formats) have been uttering the CBR name as if it were the Holy Grail of all motorcycling. So everybody has been comparing the CBR 250R with the Ninja 250R and going ga ga (mercifully not that lady, phew) over both but giving the extra star to the Honda CBR 250R while saying a few kind words about the Kawasaki Ninja 250R.  But that will all change now and that is where our real story starts.

From yesterday on, the word Ninja has come back into big circulation.  The Kawasaki Ninja 650R has been launched in India.  Motoring journos must be queueing up for rides or riding the Ninja 650R while we sit in front of our computers and bang this story in.  But we will beat the seasoned pros to the Ninja mayhem here and so ours is the first laugh.  It was in the year 2009 that the word Ninja entered into the vocabulary of the motorcyclist in India big time.  Prior to that there were the old hippie uncles, whose brains were warped by excesses of LSD, Ecstasy, various forms of tobacco and even more forms of liquor, passed on a sacred word to their cute little nephews before the good Lord said enough and raised them to heaven.  This sacred word was Ninja and the privileged few nephews (those who had these hippie uncles) uttered the name in great veneration and tried to keep it from reaching the hoi polloi (mainly because they did not know much else about the name).  To the lesser mortals (those without hippie uncles) Ninja meant that horrible mutant turtle in the “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” series.  To the ones who went to schools that still had good teachers (a tremendous rarity), Ninja meant the short form of the practitioners of the revered and highly difficult martial art form of Ninjutsu.

It goes to the credit of one Japanese company called Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) that the word Ninja has come into the vocabulary of even ordinary and very duh bikers like us.  Though the company was Japanese, the suggestion of using that name came from Americans (yeah they have hardly left anything untouched, especially if it had to do anything with petrol, a true American favourite).  Kawasaki Heavy Industries was the brain child of a venerable old Japanese man Shozo Kawasaki who built huge shipyard (in 1896) which in turn built ships. In 1906 the company diversified into making rolling stock for trains.  Over the years the product portfolio of KHI incorporated everything that one could think of; locomotives, planes (civilian and warplanes), helicopters, robots (well for now we cannot think of anything else).  Kawasaki like most Japanese companies was proud of its achievements, but in the absence of a product that was easily visible and identifiable as a Kawasaki, they did not find themselves in the everyday vocabulary of people.

So in the 1950s after Honda and Suzuki had established themselves, Kawasaki decided that building motorcycles was a good way of letting the general population know that there was this technology intensive company that one had to take cognizance of.  So Kawasaki became the third Japanese company to turn to making motorcycles and came with a background very different from the two companies before it and the one after it, which was Yamaha.  Shoichiro Honda started Honda motorcycles after first making sewing machines, while Michio Suzuki steered his company from making looms to motorcycles and Yamaha, established by Torakusu Yamaha, started off as a maker of pianos and organs (of the musical variety, so don’t go getting any ideas).  While for the other three moving into motorcycle manufacture was an up scaling of sorts for Kawasaki it was akin to down scaling.

All the four manufacturers started off with small humble puttering machines that were used as daily transport in Japan, a country ravaged by the World War II (thanks to an irritated Uncle Sam who dropped two and not one nuclear bombs on them because they were proving to be pesky, the Japanese that is).  But the Japanese are very resourceful people and they came out of their problems with all their techno prowess firing.  And they went to the United States of America, a country that rewarded big moustaches (we assure you it is not mustaches), big fire arms and more importantly huge mouths that believed that a person’s greatness was directly proportional to his bragging abilities.  In order to be able to brag, the Americans believed they needed big things.  No point in talking about small things, right?  In order to acquire their bragging rights the Americans were more than willing to part with the ubiquitous dollar and so for people wanting to sell anything (motorcycles, cars, rock music, Styrofoam, condoms, guns, pet stones, bull shit) the logical destination was the United States of America.

Since everything that the Americans wanted was usually big, it became necessary for the Japanese to manufacture bikes also that were big.  And it was in this process that Kawasaki landed up with the name Ninja for their motorcycles.  We will save that for part two of this story dear reader, so fret not.  Comeback to the website and get the second part of this story, a story like no other.

In the first part of this story we had talked about how the Americans wanted everything to be big so that they could have their bragging rights.  The same was the case for motorcycles as well.  The original icon of American motorcycling has always been Harley – Davidson.  When the Japanese went there, they found that the Harley riders were outcastes.  They gave themselves horrible sobriquets like Hell’s Angels and rode in big groups and vandalized everything on the way.  They gave motorcycling a bad name.  Honda rectified it with the “Only the nicest people ride a Honda” campaign with the launch of its Super Cub.  However, while the Americans were willing to consider that even nice people rode motorcycles they were not exactly happy with the size of the Cub.  So to sustain, big motorcycles were needed, but they also had to be different from the big Harleys for obvious reasons.

Harley Davidsons  were to Americans then, what Royal Enfield Bullets are to Indians now.  They were huge and were modified disgustingly with long kicked out front forks and had saddle bags and V twin engines that sounded glorious but leaked oil, broke down frequently and were a pain to maintain.  The technology used was the ancient push rod engine technology.  In management terms there is a concept called “Opportunity to See” and the Japanese ever the opportunists did not lose this opportunity, so they went to America and conquered it.  Their bikes were everything that the Harleys were not.  They were packed with new technology, were very reliable and most importantly they went very fast and consumed relatively less fuel.  Kawasaki saw another opportunity here, they wanted to do things differently.  So they made bikes such as the mad Mach3, called thus because it featured three cylinders in line and went super fast.  It also was a two stroke motorcycle that consumed everything that stood in its wake.  The Mach3 was not without its problems.  The middle cylinder did not cool too efficiently because it was in a sandwich and Kawasaki initially found solutions by changing the angle of banking of the cylinders.  But something more radical was required if the in line cylinders were to be cool and efficient.  So enter liquid cooling.  Kawasaki was not the inventor of liquid cooling but they put it to innovative use.

Kawasaki saw that the Americans had a penchant to do things differently.  So they were asking for pollution limits to be brought down and balmy California was at the forefront of this.  California has always been an important market for motorcycles and the clue to that lay in the weather.  Unlike Europe which was had inclement weather for most of the year, California and some other states in the US had nice weather with temperatures hovering in the eighty degrees Fahrenheit range.  The USA has always been the citadel of marketing.  You could sell anything, absolutely anything if that thing was packaged very well.  The Japanese being who they were again saw an opportunity.  Package their bikes well and the Americans would buy them in droves.  So Honda and Kawasaki upped the ante with technology.  They shifted to four strokes but their motorcycles were most unlike the Harleys that the Americans were used to.  Instead of V twin configurations, Honda went for V4 configurations while Kawasaki went for in line four cylinder configurations.  But the biggest difference was not so much in the engine as it was in the chassis.

The usual topography of America and especially that of California is long flat lands that had long straight roads that went on and on.  So typically bikes were made with no respect whatsoever for handling.  Seriously, what great handling do you require to keep going in a straight line for ever?  Europe was different and had Grand Prix racing on tracks that were twisting and turning.  Honda, the most ambitious among the Japanese wanted to conquer GP racing which was dominated mainly by British and Italian motorcycles.  GP racing taught Honda the importance of a light weight motorcycle with a chassis that could enable the rider to turn the motorcycle without losing time or balance.  The Japanese saw that the Americans raced their cars (mainly drag racing) and a bit of bikes as well.  They took the next big thing to America, circuit racing and the “race on Sunday and sell on Monday” adage took shape.  Kawasaki stole a march over the others here by creating a tractable motor in a wonderful chassis which made for a sure fire winner.  Thus the nomenclature GPz was born.  The first GPz was a 900cc and it became a hit with the Americans.

Now came the time to convert this hit into a marketing success as well.  The marketing savvy Americans wanted a name that was catchy, something that everyone could relate to.  In this meanwhile the GPz was being called the Z1 and till day it is considered to be the world’s first Superbike. The Americans told the Kawasaki factory that the ideal name for the Kawasaki super bike would be Ninja, the stealthy, quick, nimble and efficient martial artist.  Kawasaki liked it, after all it came from native Japan, from the practitioners of the martial art of Ninjutsu.  So they agreed and the name stuck, for good.  In America for a while Ninja became a generic name for a super bike like Xerox for a copier machine.

This was a good and a bad thing for Kawasaki.  It was good that their product name became synonymous with a category of motorcycle but really bad because every other Japanese super bike was also being called a Ninja.  That somehow seemed to dilute their achievement.  Sometimes too much success can work against you.  That is what happened to Kawasaki.  So it needed to do something and really quick.  Kawasaki had a liking for the letter Z.  That is why they introduced it along with the GP moniker as GPz.  So henceforth they decided to prefix their Ninja motorcycles with ZX and a number that denoted the cubic capacity of the motorcycle.  Thus was born the nomenclature of ZX-6, ZX-7, ZX-9, ZX-10 and later the ZX-11 (which was essentially an upgraded ZX-10) and finally what is considered to be the greatest Superbike and Kawasaki ever, the ZX-12.  In the United States there is today a ZX-14 as well, but that is something we shall come to soon.  The no.6 denoted a 600cc, the no.7 denoted 750cc, the no.9 denoted 900cc, 10 denoted 1000cc and when the engine went over 1000cc it became 11.  Somewhere Suzuki had decided to threaten Kawasaki with the Hayabusa and to take it head on the ZX-12 was created.

Kawasaki spread its wings to Europe as well and there they made sure that the Ninja moniker would be used in conjunction with the ZX moniker which meant that the motorcycle was a racer and so the suffix of R also was used.  So the nomenclature in Europe even today is Kawasaki ZX-10 R Ninja.  In the middle however Kawasaki found that they had to upgrade their 600cc with a shorter stroke engine and so gave it the nomenclature of ZX-6RR Ninja.  But that was a one off thing.  In Europe where greater significance is attached to taxonomy Kawasaki began using the ZZ-R nomenclature for bikes that were less sporty and more for touring.  So what is called the Ninja 250 R in India today started life in Europe as Kawasaki ZZ-R 250 and there were ZZ-R motorcycles of 750, 1000 and 1200 cc.  These were NOT Ninjas and that tradition continues till today.

In the meanwhile the changing of market conditions essentially meant that Kawasaki had started cutting down on the number of motorcycle platforms.  In racing, the 750 cc category became redundant and so the ZX7 no longer exists.  Since World Superbikes now has 1000cc for four cylinder engines, the ZX-10 R Ninja was reborn.  The ZX-12 R was put rest a few years ago.  So in Europe the Kawasaki Ninjas are strictly the ZX-6R that races in the Supersports category and the ZX-10R that races in the Superbikes category.  The Suzuki Hayabusa though very fast was never a track tool and a few years back Kawasaki launched the ZZ-R 1400 which for the first time incorporated a monocoque chassis and along with the Hayabusa sits in the sports tourer category.  Kawasaki created a for every day use a motorcycle called the ER-6n and a variant called the ER-6f.  The ER is for every day/every one, the 6 for 650 cc, the n for naked and f for faired.  So what we now get in India and the bike that launched this story, the Ninja 650 R is actually the ER-6f in Europe.

Back home in America, like in India the ER-6f became a Ninja and so received the nomenclature of Ninja 650 – R while the naked bike still goes with the ER-6n name.  In the meanwhile the ZZ-R 250 also gained the Ninja tag and became the Ninja 250 R.  So now within the Ninja category there are two types.  Kawasaki calls the non ZX Ninjas, Sports machines in the USA and the ZX Ninjas, Super Sports.  When it decided to make its 250cc bike the entry level Kawasaki globally it became a Ninja even in Europe but without the ZX prefix.  The Ninja 650 R is again a marketing strategy that works in the USA but not in Europe.  The Americans want something in the nature of a super bike so there is the Ninja 650 R as also a Ninja 1000 which is a faired version of the Z 1000.  In markets such as as Thailand and India, Kawasaki is now following the American nomenclature and so the 650 became the Ninja 650 R.  The next bike will probably be the Ninja 1000 and not the ZX-10R Ninja which would be much more expensive.  In India and Thailand getting a big bike with the Ninja name is great, people are not fastidious like the Europeans who insist on proper taxonomy.  So the marketing teams have been selling the non cutting edge bikes as Ninjas just as they do in America.  In fact, since the Ninja 250 R and the 650 R that are sold here are of European specifications they get fuel injection, while the Americans still do with carburetors on their bikes.

Thus dear friends ends the Ninja story for now.  We request you to now keep a couple of things in mind.  The first is that in the narration for the sake of continuity we have not talked of some models that came in and went.  We also did not talk about other existing Kawasaki models such as the Versys, the Concourse etc because this is a Ninja story only. We would also like you to remember that the reality of the Japanese market is slightly different.  At one time Kawasaki even made scooters and 50cc pocket rockets.  In Japan for Kawasaki it is a completely different ball game altogether, something that we also do not know fully about and hence will not comment on.  Thank you for reading, hope you enjoyed the ride down history lane.  Please do comment, it will be hugely appreciated.

It could be said that what Michael Schumacher has been to Formula1, Valentino Rossi has been to MotoGP.  The parallels are far too many to ignore.  If Schumacher transformed Ferrari from  a has been to the most coveted and successful team, Rossi did so with Yamaha.  Michael Schumacher won a record number of seven world titles in F1 and Valentino Rossi won the same number in the premier class apart from two more in the 125cc and 250cc classes.  Michael Schumacher rose to great heights and decimated legends on the way, so too did Rossi.  Schumacher made F1 fans forget the greats that preceded him as did Valentino Rossi in MotoGP.  Michael Schumacher wanted his team mates to have a less than equal status, something that Valentino Rossi also always wanted.  Michael Schumacher has a mentor called Ross Brawn and Valentino Rossi has one called Jerry Burgess.  Michael Schumacher took his team of people when he switched from one manufacturer to another and ditto with Valentino Rossi.  Schumacher instilled fear in the FIA and race stewards and that is the case with Rossi and the FIM and race stewards.  Schumacher was hated by his team mates and rivals as was Rossi.  Schumacher seems to have destroyed his formidable reputation by coming out of retirement and Rossi seems to be doing the same by not retiring when he should have.  Now that we have finished drawing an exhaustive list of parallels between the two legends let us get down to the business of understanding Rossi, just like we did with Schumacher.  And yet again we tread where angels fear to tread and claim that we will throw up a story that is based in objectivity.

Valentino Rossi started young and with typical Italian style and flair.  He took one year to learn the ropes of the 125cc class and the next year won the World Championship in that class.  He then moved on to the 250cc class, took one year to acclimatize and won the world title in that class in the subsequent year.  He did this on an Italian machine called Aprilia and was sponsored by an Italian beer company called Nostro Azzuro.  He always raced with the number 46 even when he was world champion because he is superstitious and believes in that number because his father raced with it.  Also it totals to one anyway, numerologically speaking.  Each of his victories was followed by celebrations that were as spectacular as the victories themselves.  The fans loved him, TV commentators loved him and even the next door girls’ parents loved him.  It was always “Everybody Loves Rossi” (please excuse us Ray Romano for punning like this on your show).  Well there was this one person who did not like all that much.  He found Rossi very cocky and irreverent especially since he was Aprilia’s original favourite son who won multiple 250cc championships with the manufacturer.  This man goes by the name of Massimiliano Biaggi or the Roman Emperor.  The Roman Emperor found that his reign and his reputation very totally disrupted by this gangly lad called Rossi.

Just after he won his title with Aprilia in the 250cc category, Rossi found himself staring at an opportunity.  The great Mick Doohan who was five times 500cc world champion had decided he had had enough.  Mich Doohan was the man around whom the Honda legend was built just as Yamaha’s was built first around Kenny Roberts Sr. and later in a more pronounced way around Wayne Rainey.  Rainey had made the Yamaha look invincible and was leading a world championship and a race at Misano when he crashed and became paralysed chest downwards.  After that the Yamaha seat was never filled properly by anyone and Max Biaggi was riding for the works Yamaha team along with Rossi’s hero Norifumi Abe who later lost his life in a road accident.  Biaggi could not and did not make any difference to Yamaha in a positive way.  Neither could Loris Capirossi who tried the Yamaha for one season. Mick Doohan’s decision meant that Honda had to find a very capable rider, one who would continue the reign started by Doohan instead of going the Yamaha way. Rossi and Honda were made for each other at that point.  Honda needed a rider who could keep them in the front and Rossi needed a ride that could keep him in the front.  The first year of their togetherness was very akin to Rossi’s history in the 125cc and 250cc classes.  Rossi learnt the ropes under the watchful eye of Jerry Burgess who was Mick Doohan’s crew chief and who had trained under the legendary Erv Kanemoto.  The second year in the 500cc class and on the Honda, Rossi did what was now a part of a pattern.  He won the world championship.

In another story in the Power Stroke column itself we have talked about the clout that Honda enjoys in GP racing and how it successfully changes everything including rules.  Honda felt that the 500cc two strokes were meaningless in a world which was moving in the direction of environmental correctness and therefore was looking at reduced emissions.  In the real world four strokes were the way forward and Honda felt that should be so in racing as well.  What Honda wants, Honda gets and so the MotoGP category came into being.  Five hundred cc two strokes paved the way for 990cc four strokes.  Electronics also came into play.  Rossi became number one and there was no challenge to him till such time that Daijiro Kato looked like a threat.  Honda wanted to promote Daijiro, because he was Japanese and very rarely did any Japanese rider look like a world championship prospect. But unfortunately Kato died in a crash and Honda decided that it was time to slow down the bikes and shifted to an 800cc format.  But before that happened Honda found that Valentino Rossi was becoming very demanding and Honda always puts itself first and so Rossi in order to keep his ego intact, went to Yamaha.  Yamaha who were starved of victories did everything that the Rossi-Burgess combo ordered and in the process went on to become the most successful manufacturer in the 800cc era and more importantly Honda went rapidly backwards and did not yet win a title in the 800cc era as yet..  The only other manufacturer to win a title was Ducati.  Yamaha realized that it cannot only depend upon Rossi and also that his team mate Colin Edwards was growing rather long in the tooth and was only producing less than ordinary results and so decided that it needed to invest in a younger rider for the future.

They found Jorge Lorenzo who was brash, tempestuous, arrogant and imminently dislikable, but pretty talented.  In the very first year on the Yamaha Lorenzo went like stink.  He crashed in practices, walked on crutches but ended up on the podium after races just like Lewis Hamilton did in his first year in F1.  Rossi was not comfortable with the growing reputation of Lorenzo and the complaints started.  First it was all about how he develops bikes and how Lorenzo benefits from that.  As Lorenzo grew in stature and became a bigger threat, Rossi issued an ultimatum.  Me or Lorenzo, choose.  Yamaha was caught between the devil and the deep sea.  On the one hand was Rossi the man who transformed Yamaha from a lost in the wilderness team to a consistently world championship winning one, but the man is now in his thirties and beginning to crack under pressure occasionally. On the other hand is Lorenzo growing in strength, younger but his development skills were yet unknown.  Yamaha made a call and decided on Lorenzo and to invest in the future since Ben Spies who had won spectacularly in the rookie season of the World Superbike Championship was also contracted to them.

Rossi had successfully burnt bridges with Honda and now with Yamaha.  Suzuki, the other manufacturer in the fray, it seemed had forgotten how to build motorcycles.  Kawasaki came, saw and got conquered and had already run away, tail firmly between its hind legs.  That left only Ducati.  Ducati had always been an iffy machine, its only success truly coming in the hands of Casey Stoner who seemed like he could ride anything, anywhere, anytime.  The Stoner and Ducati relationship too had developed problems and his mentor at Ducati, Livio Suppo had gone to Honda already, and made a case for Stoner.  Honda bought that because Stoner seemed to be the only realistic possibility of fetching them an 800cc world title before it is wound up at the end of this year.  Ducati’s other riders such as Loris Capirossi, Marco Melandri, Nicky Hayden and handful of others  found the Ducati to be more than a handful.  They had all failed spectacularly.  Ducati’s only hope now was Rossi.  So the brilliant Italian marriage happened in MotoGP, just like the German marriage in F1.  Rossi is now finding out that the Ducati is not just more than a handful, it is more than his shoulderful as well.  And Rossi is now hovering dangerously on the precipice that can destroy is formidable reputation.  So far this season he has been saved and made to look respectable by other people’s misfortunes.  Otherwise Rossi is comfortably behind the Hondas by a second and a half and some times even two seconds.  Now the rules are changing again next year.  Ducati is not a manufacturer with a lot of experience in GP racing.  If they falter again, Rossi’s reputation will be in tatters.

So is this all Rossi’s fault?  We say yes.  Rossi should have understood that he was in no position to issue ultimatums to Yamaha.  He should have reconciled to riding around on a Yamaha with Jorge Lorenzo having equal status.  If that was too difficult to digest, he should have just retired from GP racing gracefully and gone into rallying, apparently a sport he enjoys.  That would have looked like an ace motorcycle racer trying something new.  But Rossi chose Ducati and this could end in tears, like Michael Schumacher’s return to F1 is threatening to.  Schumacher was doing quite fine racing a Honda CBR in the occasional race in German Superbikes.  But he chose to come back to F1.  Now we have two legends who have the proverbial sword of Damocles hanging on their heads.  They are most likely to come out looking second best from the decisions that they have made.   But ultimately who knows.  We shall wait and see.

Who doesn’t know Michael Schumacher?  Everyone does.  Even those who do not know know Formula1 or follow it regularly also know of him.  He has almost all the records in F1 against his name with the exception of a few such as the highest number of pole positions.  He is somebody who arouses extreme emotions among people.  Some love him, adore him and swear that he is without doubt the greatest ever driver to grace the Formula1 grid.  At the other end of the spectrum you find another set of people who hate him, swear at him and brand him a cheat who has used the most unfair of means to reach where he has reached.  The first set cite his 91 victories in F1 and his seven world championships while the second set of people point out to his attempted taking out of Jacque Villeneuve from a race to try and win the world championship and his parking his Ferrari at an awkward place in Monte Carlo to baulk Fernando Alonso from taking pole position.  They also point out that Schumacher never let his team mates have the same level of equipment as himself and that he always wanted to be number1 in his team.  Losers like Rubens Barrichello who played second fiddle to him by their own volition then, now speak about what a horrible situation it is to be in,  when a team designates someone as number2.

The amazing thing is that none of these stories or perceptions are apocryphal.  Schumacher was all the things that are pointed out by his fans and his detractors.  Despite the shortcomings of character that Schumacher suffered from, one can say without the fear of contradiction that Michael Schumacher was a very gifted driver who had nerves of steel and the determination of a predator when it came to motor racing and winning.  In terms of ability Michael Schumacher was way ahead of the Damon Hills, the Jacque Villeneuves, the David Coulthards and even the Mika Hakkinens of Formula1 racing.  All four named above won in cars designed by a genius called Adrian Newey, the first two at Williams and the latter two at McLaren.  Michael Schumacher won his first world championship in an unfancied Benetton car that was running a Ford V8 engine while the all conquering Williams cars were running Renault’s exemplary V10 units.  His second world championship had the Renault unit behind him but the definitely inferior Benetton chassis under him.  Yet he won again.  So the world said Formula1 was a Newey vs Schuey contest, where the genius of a car designer was pitted against the genius of a car driver.  The driver triumphed.

But Michael Schumacher was no ordinary mortal.  He wanted challenges and he wanted to prove that he was the greatest greatest.  So when Ferrari that hadn’t won a race in a decade leave alone a world championship, asked him to drive for them, Michael picked up the gauntlet.  While at Benetton he won a race at Jerez when his car was stuck in fifth gear, with pit stop and all.  He repeated an almost equally incredible feat in his first season at Ferrari by winning in a Ferrari which was firing on anything between 7 and 9 cylinders out of the ten, in the rain at Barcelona and won himself the tag of Rainmeister.  He also broke the Ferrari jinx of not having victories.

Schumacher’s talent and determination saw many of the team members at Benetton following him to Ferrari.  The most important of them all was Ross Brawn.  The British engineer was recognised as the most astute when it came to pit strategies and his presence on the Ferrari pit wall helped matters immensely.  Rory Byrne, the South African born designer also went to Ferrari replacing the legendary John Barnard and in one year the prancing horse began prancing at the behest of Michael Schumacher instead of lying down contentedly.  Ferrari transformed from being an also ran to the winningest team ever.  Prior to Schumacher, F1 greats such as Alain Prost, Nigel Mansell and Nelson Piquet had driven for Ferrari but none of them could transform Ferrari into the outfit that Schumacher made out of it.  Schumacher’s cleanest world championships came at Ferrari and he had five of them there.  Schumacher  it was said could wring a car by its steering and make it do what he wanted it to while team mates such as Barichello and Massa were struggling with the same car.  So when Schumacher announced retirement at the end of 2006, it was believed that the curtain had finally fallen on a great albeit controversial era in Formula1.  Schumacher went out of F1 and into retirement with his head held high and his reputation sky high.  A good story should have closed here.  But that was not to be.

In the year 2010 Michael Schumacher flummoxed the world by doing the unthinkable.  He came out of retirement and instead of going to his beloved Ferrari team he stepped into an all German Mercedes GP team.  In 2009 the same team had run as Brawn GP after Honda gave away the team to Ross Brawn after they decided to quit F1 in 2009.  Prior to that this team was BAR and funnily enough it was set up by Craig Pollock the manager of Schumacher’s arch enemy Jacque Villeneuve for Villeneuve after buying out Ken Tyrell’s eponymous team.  The present Mercedes GP team has its antecedents in the Tyrell team of the past. The performances that Michael Schumacher dished out in the Mercedes car in 2010 and so far this season will make a rookie blush.  In 2010 it was embarrassing to see Michael Schumacher losing track position to rookies such as Kamui Kobayashi, and his team mate Nico Rosberg seemed to be in a different league in a car which was not performing properly.

So the cascade of questions began.  Why did Michael Schumacher return from retirement?  Why did he chose to do so with Mercedes GP?  What happened to his all conquering ability that could transform very ordinary cars into race winners?  So did Michael Schumacher only win when things could be stage managed in his favour?  The amazing thing about this world is that every question has an answer and sadly more than one answer and even more sadly none of the answers have any objectivity.  His unfriendly rivals said “see we told you so” while his other detractors said “in three years F1 changed so much that Schumacher lost his ability to influence the FIA into doing things his way” and his fans said “Mercedes designed a stupid car” and the pundits said “the tyres in F1 changed too much for Schumacher” while other pundits said “Schumacher is too old and slow to race the young guns such as Lewis Hamilton, Fernando Alonso and Sebastian Vettel”.  None of these answers are in any sense real answers to the questions raised.  And now we shall set off to tread where angels fear to tread and come out with objective answers to those questions.

So let us begin.  Why did Schumacher come out of retirement? and Why did he chose to do so with Mercedes GP?  Michael Schumacher was coaxed out of retirement by his old crony Ross Brawn.  You may ask why?  Here is the reason.  Ross Brawn inherited a troubled Honda team as Principal and was later saddled with it as team owner who needed to quickly get rid of it in order to keep it viable.  Enter Mercedes Benz.  Mercedes Benz always wanted to take over McLaren and make it their own team.  They had the biggest share holding in it.  But the wily Ron Dennis did not want to hand over what he had built to Mercedes Benz.  So he does everything in his control to keep the baying Mercedes at bay.  He even irks them by launching a car development programme by keeping them out.  For Mercedes the Brawn GP team looked like manna from heaven.  It had just won its World Championship both as constructor and also for driver Jenson Button.  So here was a winning team that was willing to be sold and Mercedes pounced on it.  Then starts the dilemma.

What about the drivers?  There was Rubens Barichello, a whiner and  one who had rubbed Brawn on the wrong side by talking about how badly he was treated at Ferrari.  As far as Brawn was concerned there was no place for Barichello in the team.  He tolerated him for two years because in the first year Barichello was contracted to Honda and in the second when the whole existence of the team itself was in doubt Brawn was not in a position to pick and choose his drivers.  But under new ownership things were different and so Barichello was gently led to the door, slowly pushed out and the door firmly shut on his face.  And then what of Jenson Button?  It took Button 113 Grands Prix to claim his first victory and that too at the Hungaroring in the rain where the attrition rate was very high.  His first six wins in as many races in 2009 faded into oblivion as towards the second half of the season Button was barely just finishing races and finishing on the podium rarely in a car that was solid and reliable.  He claimed the championship after a lot of huffing and puffing and was decorated with the sobriquet “weakest ever F1 World Champion”.  So confidence in Button was not too high but his demands for salary were.  So Button too is shown the door and he finds himself a drive at McLaren, ostensibly as number 2 to Lewis Hamilton, though all concerned made great attempts to say otherwise.

So team Mercedes GP needs drivers and good ones at that.  Nico Rosberg was always considered to be as talented as Lewis Hamilton, maybe more but was stuck in the non-performing Williams team.  So when his contract made him free to look at other opportunities he did so immediately and Mercedes found the first of its two drivers.  But there was still a problem.  While Rosberg was undoubtedly talented he had not yet won a race and Mercedes needed a winning driver to take the team forward.  Scan the drivers and the picture presents itself.  Fernando Alonso was contracted to Ferrari who bought out a lack lustre and greedy Kimi Raikonnen from his contract.  Hamilton was a McLaren baby and there was no question of weaning him away from there.  Sebastian Vettel was promising yet unproven and firmly contracted to Red Bull Racing.  Literally there was no race winning driver available to Mercedes.  So Ross Brawn pulls out his phone and calls old buddy Schumacher.  “You actually retired too early you know.  There is yet a lot of racing left in you.  So what if you are pushing forty one, look how fit you are.  There is a good paycheck also involved in this and you will love it all”.  Those are obviously not the words that Brawn spoke but he must have said something along similar lines.  Michael Schumacher ever the fierce competitor sees an opportunity to teach young turks such as Hamilton a lesson or two and put them in their place.  He agrees.  Mercedes agrees.  A German team, with a German legend at the helm.  Even the sponsors love it.  Lo and behold, Schumacher is back and appearing and doing the opposite of Harry Houdini who usually disappeared.

But how is the comeback coming along?  Every body including Michael Schumacher realize the fallacy of their thinking.  Schumacher or the Mercedes car were in no shape to win.  F1 had moved on in terms of its rules and while Schumacher was still fit and fast, the extra years and the three years away from the F1 grid meant that others such as Sebastian Vettel, Fernando Alonso, Lewis Hamilton, Nico Rosberg and even Mark Webber were that couple of tenths per lap faster than Michael Schumacher.  A couple of tenths per lap is the difference between day and night and Schumacher found himself dicing in the mid field which he never did before.  Excuses were made and it was said that in 2011 Schumacher will find a car and rules to his liking and therefore he will comeback a winner.  In the meanwhile Schumacher himself stopped talking about his eighth world championship and started talking about race wins.  Now even that seems improbable.  So what went wrong?  The answer is nothing really.  Everyone concerned overestimated what Schumacher could do by underestimating how much three years away from a sport can mean to an ageing driver.  Schumacher drives fast but only fast enough for a place between seventh and tenth on a good day.  Rip Van Winkle slept for twenty years and found that the world had changed.  It took only three years for Michael Schumacher to realize the same.

It could be said that what Michael Schumacher has been to Formula1, Valentino Rossi has been to MotoGP.  The parallels are far too many to ignore.  If Schumacher transformed Ferrari from  a has been to the most coveted and successful team, Rossi did so with Yamaha.  Michael Schumacher won a record number of seven world titles in F1 and Valentino Rossi won the same number in the premier class apart from two more in the 125cc and 250cc classes.  Michael Schumacher rose to great heights and decimated legends on the way, so too did Rossi.  Schumacher made F1 fans forget the greats that preceded him as did Valentino Rossi in MotoGP.  Michael Schumacher wanted his team mates to have a less than equal status, something that Valentino Rossi also always wanted.  Michael Schumacher has a mentor called Ross Brawn and Valentino Rossi has one called Jerry Burgess.  Michael Schumacher took his team of people when he switched from one manufacturer to another and ditto with Valentino Rossi.  Schumacher instilled fear in the FIA and race stewards and that is the case with Rossi and the FIM and race stewards.  Schumacher was hated by his team mates and rivals as was Rossi.  Schumacher seems to have destroyed his formidable reputation by coming out of retirement and Rossi seems to be doing the same by not retiring when he should have.  Now that we have finished drawing an exhaustive list of parallels between the two legends let us get down to the business of understanding Rossi, just like we did with Schumacher.  And yet again we tread where angels fear to tread and claim that we will throw up a story that is based in objectivity.

Valentino Rossi started young and with typical Italian style and flair.  He took one year to learn the ropes of the 125cc class and the next year won the World Championship in that class.  He then moved on to the 250cc class, took one year to acclimatize and won the world title in that class in the subsequent year.  He did this on an Italian machine called Aprilia and was sponsored by an Italian beer company called Nostro Azzuro.  He always raced with the number 46 even when he was world champion because he is superstitious and believes in that number because his father raced with it.  Also it totals to one anyway, numerologically speaking.  Each of his victories was followed by celebrations that were as spectacular as the victories themselves.  The fans loved him, TV commentators loved him and even the next door girls’ parents loved him.  It was always “Everybody Loves Rossi” (please excuse us Ray Romano for punning like this on your show).  Well there was this one person who did not like all that much.  He found Rossi very cocky and irreverent especially since he was Aprilia’s original favourite son who won multiple 250cc championships with the manufacturer.  This man goes by the name of Massimiliano Biaggi or the Roman Emperor.  The Roman Emperor found that his reign and his reputation very totally disrupted by this gangly lad called Rossi.

Just after he won his title with Aprilia in the 250cc category, Rossi found himself staring at an opportunity.  The great Mick Doohan who was five times 500cc world champion had decided he had had enough.  Mich Doohan was the man around whom the Honda legend was built just as Yamaha’s was built first around Kenny Roberts Sr. and later in a more pronounced way around Wayne Rainey.  Rainey had made the Yamaha look invincible and was leading a world championship and a race at Misano when he crashed and became paralysed chest downwards.  After that the Yamaha seat was never filled properly by anyone and Max Biaggi was riding for the works Yamaha team along with Rossi’s hero Norifumi Abe who later lost his life in a road accident.  Biaggi could not and did not make any difference to Yamaha in a positive way.  Neither could Loris Capirossi who tried the Yamaha for one season. Mick Doohan’s decision meant that Honda had to find a very capable rider, one who would continue the reign started by Doohan instead of going the Yamaha way. Rossi and Honda were made for each other at that point.  Honda needed a rider who could keep them in the front and Rossi needed a ride that could keep him in the front.  The first year of their togetherness was very akin to Rossi’s history in the 125cc and 250cc classes.  Rossi learnt the ropes under the watchful eye of Jerry Burgess who was Mick Doohan’s crew chief and who had trained under the legendary Erv Kanemoto.  The second year in the 500cc class and on the Honda, Rossi did what was now a part of a pattern.  He won the world championship.

In another story in the Power Stroke column itself we have talked about the clout that Honda enjoys in GP racing and how it successfully changes everything including rules.  Honda felt that the 500cc two strokes were meaningless in a world which was moving in the direction of environmental correctness and therefore was looking at reduced emissions.  In the real world four strokes were the way forward and Honda felt that should be so in racing as well.  What Honda wants, Honda gets and so the MotoGP category came into being.  Five hundred cc two strokes paved the way for 990cc four strokes.  Electronics also came into play.  Rossi became number one and there was no challenge to him till such time that Daijiro Kato looked like a threat.  Honda wanted to promote Daijiro, because he was Japanese and very rarely did any Japanese rider look like a world championship prospect. But unfortunately Kato died in a crash and Honda decided that it was time to slow down the bikes and shifted to an 800cc format.  But before that happened Honda found that Valentino Rossi was becoming very demanding and Honda always puts itself first and so Rossi in order to keep his ego intact, went to Yamaha.  Yamaha who were starved of victories did everything that the Rossi-Burgess combo ordered and in the process went on to become the most successful manufacturer in the 800cc era and more importantly Honda went rapidly backwards and did not yet win a title in the 800cc era as yet..  The only other manufacturer to win a title was Ducati.  Yamaha realized that it cannot only depend upon Rossi and also that his team mate Colin Edwards was growing rather long in the tooth and was only producing less than ordinary results and so decided that it needed to invest in a younger rider for the future.

They found Jorge Lorenzo who was brash, tempestuous, arrogant and imminently dislikable, but pretty talented.  In the very first year on the Yamaha Lorenzo went like stink.  He crashed in practices, walked on crutches but ended up on the podium after races just like Lewis Hamilton did in his first year in F1.  Rossi was not comfortable with the growing reputation of Lorenzo and the complaints started.  First it was all about how he develops bikes and how Lorenzo benefits from that.  As Lorenzo grew in stature and became a bigger threat, Rossi issued an ultimatum.  Me or Lorenzo, choose.  Yamaha was caught between the devil and the deep sea.  On the one hand was Rossi the man who transformed Yamaha from a lost in the wilderness team to a consistently world championship winning one, but the man is now in his thirties and beginning to crack under pressure occasionally. On the other hand is Lorenzo growing in strength, younger but his development skills were yet unknown.  Yamaha made a call and decided on Lorenzo and to invest in the future since Ben Spies who had won spectacularly in the rookie season of the World Superbike Championship was also contracted to them.

Rossi had successfully burnt bridges with Honda and now with Yamaha.  Suzuki, the other manufacturer in the fray, it seemed had forgotten how to build motorcycles.  Kawasaki came, saw and got conquered and had already run away, tail firmly between its hind legs.  That left only Ducati.  Ducati had always been an iffy machine, its only success truly coming in the hands of Casey Stoner who seemed like he could ride anything, anywhere, anytime.  The Stoner and Ducati relationship too had developed problems and his mentor at Ducati, Livio Suppo had gone to Honda already, and made a case for Stoner.  Honda bought that because Stoner seemed to be the only realistic possibility of fetching them an 800cc world title before it is wound up at the end of this year.  Ducati’s other riders such as Loris Capirossi, Marco Melandri, Nicky Hayden and handful of others  found the Ducati to be more than a handful.  They had all failed spectacularly.  Ducati’s only hope now was Rossi.  So the brilliant Italian marriage happened in MotoGP, just like the German marriage in F1.  Rossi is now finding out that the Ducati is not just more than a handful, it is more than his shoulderful as well.  And Rossi is now hovering dangerously on the precipice that can destroy is formidable reputation.  So far this season he has been saved and made to look respectable by other people’s misfortunes.  Otherwise Rossi is comfortably behind the Hondas by a second and a half and some times even two seconds.  Now the rules are changing again next year.  Ducati is not a manufacturer with a lot of experience in GP racing.  If they falter again, Rossi’s reputation will be in tatters.

So is this all Rossi’s fault?  We say yes.  Rossi should have understood that he was in no position to issue ultimatums to Yamaha.  He should have reconciled to riding around on a Yamaha with Jorge Lorenzo having equal status.  If that was too difficult to digest, he should have just retired from GP racing gracefully and gone into rallying, apparently a sport he enjoys.  That would have looked like an ace motorcycle racer trying something new.  But Rossi chose Ducati and this could end in tears, like Michael Schumacher’s return to F1 is threatening to.  Schumacher was doing quite fine racing a Honda CBR in the occasional race in German Superbikes.  But he chose to come back to F1.  Now we have two legends who have the proverbial sword of Damocles hanging on their heads.  They are most likely to come out looking second best from the decisions that they have made.   But ultimately who knows.  We shall wait and see.

For someone living in India, the attitude that the West has towards motorcycles is a little difficult to comprehend.  In fact, most would find that attitude bizarre.  In India the motorcycle is an extension of the self, one that goes everywhere with the user (the word rider has been deliberately left out since it can connote other meanings).  It is used for the office commute, weekend getaway, family outing (one or sometimes two small kids on the petrol tank, wife with a little baby on the pillion seat) and even inter city transport.  So what would life be without this contraption that enables all people to do all things (including riding very badly and getting killed)?  Unimaginable would be the most suitable word here.  But the West, especially America sees the motorcycle as the preferred steed of the anti social and uncouth rogue who roams the American freeways like Satan does the roads of hell.  It doesn’t help that Harley Davidson riders not only call themselves HOGS but look like them (hogs that is), unwashed and unkempt.  Sobriquets like Hells Angels and Hell Raisers add to the already powerful imagery.  No wonder then that motorcycling is not considered the habit of the genteel and the respect worthy in the United States of A.

And how is the scenario in Europe? Not too different, but not like in the US.  The key difference is that in European countries motorcycles are not the preserve of hooligans, beer drinkers and stink raisers. Still the motorcycle is not the preferred mode of transport.  The answer to understanding this lies in the weather.  Europe is near the tropic of Capricorn and upwards towards the north pole.  So with the exception of some sunny areas in Spain most of the time Europe is quite cold.  It means that riding on a motorcycles will lead to the formation of icicles on ones face, hands and legs.  Cold increases with wind chill which the rider of a motorcycle will have to encounter and with a great deal of discomfort and maybe even suffer frost bite.  No wonder then motorcycling is popular mainly in sunny Spain and not in the rest of Europe where the occasional adventurist will want to ride a motorcycle in the summer when the temperatures reach a warm 15 degrees Celsius.   And if you are in England it rains everyday and who would want to ride in the rain?  So four wheelers with HVAC and good dynamics are preferred.

It is therefore this reason that the Europeans prefer four wheeled motorsport to the two wheeled one.  And motor racing is very European, at least in the way in which we know it here in India.  So everywhere there is this greater glamour and viewership  that is associated with Formula One and not MotoGP.  Old timers will remember old ads in between races featuring riders such as Ralph Waldmann, Doriano Romboni and Olivier Jacque asking the viewers to watch two wheeled racing since it is every bit as exciting as four wheeled racing.  Ralph Waldmann who was sponsored by Marlboro once said that F1 drivers like his fellow German Michael Schumacher thought of themselves as gods and the motorcycle racers as mere mortals and therefore never their equals.  Waldmann was very miffed at being ignored by not just Formula1 drivers but by the media as well.  Things have improved a bit these days but that is still insignificant.

MotoGP is a very European phenomenon and it emphasizes more on the prototype character of racing than production machinery racing.  The latter is more the creation of the Americans, where the” race on Sunday and sell on Monday” dictum is supposed to work.  Maybe that is as only as real as the free market, but it seems to work for the Americans.  The Americans followed a policy of isolationism for centuries before the Second World War and even today the mindset of the Americans is to create things for themselves on their soil only.  Baseball, NBA and importantly for us the AMA or the American Motorcycle Association are for America only; and let the rest of the world be damned, it is not for them to reason why.

The marketing savvy Japanese caught on to this trend and decided to sell motorcycles in America, the country with the largest per capita consumption and with a population willing to be persuaded by advertising and other opinion changing practices.  Honda went to America and persuaded them to believe that “only the nicest people ride a Honda” and sold many motorcycles before starting to sell cars in big numbers.  Suzuki who saw the days of its power looms being numbered quickly shifted focus to selling motorcycles and lo and behold there was America, the land of the plenty to go to.  Kawasaki Heavy Industries was doing a whole load of good work in huge industrial projects, ship building, train car building, train locomotive manufacture, helicopters and planes but none of these were giving it the visibility it wanted, so it decided to showcase its technological prowess with motorcycles and what place better than the land of uninhibited consumption?  Yamaha also wanted to do things other just making musical instruments and so got into motorcycle manufacturing and like the other Japanese companies they too went to America. All these companies raced their motorcycles (which are all production based) on Sunday and sold them on Monday and were not too bothered with the rest of the world, until they saw another window of opportunity.

The Europeans may not have taken to motorcycling too much but they were not entirely averse to racing.  So there were marques like Norton, Triumph, Vincent, Velocette, Moto Guzzi, MV Augusta, Benelli, Ducati, Morbidelli and Zundapp who were making prototypes and showcasing their techno prowess.  The fiercely competitive Honda wanted a piece of this pie as well and went to Europe with machines that were laughed at initially but feared and dreaded later on.  Honda did most unconventional things such as building six cylindered 125 cc machines and beat the four strokes of MV Augusta and Moto Guzzi with wickedly powerful two strokes.  The rest of the Japanese did not want to be left out of this and so faithfully followed Honda to Europe and to Grand Prix racing.

The two stroke motorcycles of Honda, Yamaha and Suzuki collectively annihilated not just European manufacturers from racing but from manufacture of two wheelers itself.  All the British manufacturers shut shop as did most Germans with the exception of BMW which became a niche player and most Italians went into different states of doldrums from which they never recovered.  All Italian motorcycle marques have been taken over by either venture capitalists or other manufacturers from other parts of the world.

The GP market became the sole preserve of Japanese companies with only Cagiva in the late 1980s and early 1990s trying to go racing with them.  Of the Japanese Kawasaki was not always involved; it flirted with GP racing  occasionally first in the 1980s with riders like Kork Bollington and Anton Mang and again in the first decade of the new Millennium with riders like John Hopkins, Anthony West and Marco Melandri.  Aprilia tried GP racing and left (though it did stunningly well in the 125cc and 250 cc categories with years of domination) BMW threatened to try but did not and only Ducati thanks to one Casey Stoner was able to stand up to the might of the Japanese big three.  Suzuki has over the years become a marginal player especially with the re-introduction of four stroke racing in GPs.   The re-introduction of four stroke engines in GPs is a fascinating tale, one that merits great attention.  We have said that the Americans brought production machinery racing into the picture.  A similar thing was tried in Europe too but with the exception of UK which now faithfully follows what the Americans do, production machinery racing did not find too many takers.

To try and make production machinery a global phenomenon the European companies such as Ducati took the lead because they thought that there would be no competition from the Japanese, at least for a while. So the whole World Superbike racing concept came into being in the 1990s and gained some currency in the first decade of the 21st Century.  Initially World Superbikes was a Ducati show but the Japanese got wind of the possible popularity of this series and invaded it big time.  Now all Japanese manufacturers are involved in World Superbikes and three of them in MotoGP.  It is here that the plot thickens.  Honda is so powerful that it can write and re-write rules with only some token resistance from Yamaha and no one else.  Take a look at MotoGP.  What do you see?  The 500cc two stroke class first paved the way for a 990cc four stroke MotoGP class and then to the now existing 800cc MotoGP class.  The 990cc was to not tread on the toes of the promoters of World Superbike Racing.  However, that has changed now.  Next year onwards, MotoGP will allow production based engines being fitted into custom chassis and will have an engine capacity of up to 1000cc.   Remember this point we will come back to it.

The 250cc two stroke racing class was changed to the new Moto2 four stroke 600cc class (at the behest of Honda and it killed European manufacturers Aprilia and KTM in the process).  To differentiate this from World Supersport which has production 600cc motorcycles, Moto2 had only Honda supplying 600cc engines to teams who could make or buy custom chassis.  This year is the last for the oldest category of racing, the two stroke 125cc class.  This will be replaced next year by the new Moto3 class which will use single cylinder 250cc four stroke engines (Honda at work again and Aprilia and KTM again being the losers here).  Now can you see the big picture emerging?  If you can good, otherwise here it is for you.  The Americans love dirt track racing in the form of Motocross and Supercross.  The most popular category of engine there is the 250cc four stroke, single cylinder.  So engines used in Motocross and Supercross will find their way in a different state of tune and in a different chassis into the Moto3 class.  Result no engine development costs that will go through the roof.  Synergies mean less spending that can be spread across different forms of motorsport.  And the Moto2 class now.  Right now it is Honda alone supplying the engines, but in the near future the same laws that apply to claiming rules teams in MotoGP class next year can be used for the Moto2 class as well.  This means that there will be the opening up of the 600cc category for production based engines in prototype chassis.  This means no additional costs of engine development.

We asked you to remember the 1000cc MotoGP category a while ago.  Let us to revisit that.  World Superbikes run on 1000cc engines.  Now MotoGP will allow prototypes along with production based 1000cc engines in prototype frames.  This means at some point in the future, motorcycle manufacturers may go the Formula1 way, where they will only supply engines and not the chassis.  So MotoGP could become what Moto2 is only difference being engine capacity.  So teams can choose from BMW, Aprilia, Kawasaki and MV Augusta engines and put them in Suter, FTR, Moriwaki or Tech3 frames.  Honda, Suzuki and Yamaha engines too will be eligible.  But in all likelihood with the exception of one or two teams most will go for Japanese engines anyway and therefore the European manufacturers will not be of great significance here.  Now do you get the full picture?

This is typically business dictating the rules of the sport.  Over the new rules of MotoGP the promoters of MotoGP, Dorna and the promoters of World Superbikes, Infront are already fighting.  With next year getting nearer, the fight will become more intense.  The FIM will have to adjudicate and in all possibility it will be in favour of MotoGP and Dorna, because they have more muscle.  World Superbikes and MotoGP have small grids, though the Superbike grid is slightly bigger with 21 motorcycles compared to the 17 on the MotoGP grid.  Last year the Supersport grid was all but non existent due to everyone moving to Moto2.  This year it has grown mainly due to an influx of riders and teams from Hungary, Russia, Poland, etc.  But it could just fall again next year if the new teams do not have funding.  So what are we going to see?  One series instead of the two?  Will GP racing be international while Superbike and Supersport racing become national and feeders to the GP series?  Who knows, but in the world of business anything can happen, and since this sport is dictated by business, anything is possible in this sport as well.

What does one do with Formula One these days?  Why is it so horrible and why are politics more important the racing?  There have been in the past, debates about Formula1.  Some have called it a sport, others have called it business and now everyone calls it politics.  Take a closer look at F1 in the recent years and you will see it is none of these things.  It is reasonable to assume that in sport, business or in politics the main aim is to succeed and win.  F1 of today contradicts that basic purpose.  It is a mindless game that geriatrics who are in control of F1 play and God only knows if they are happy with the productions of this mindlessness.  Look at the personalities associated with F1.  The ring master and Supremo is an 80 year old man who goes by the name of Bernie Ecclestone.  The President of the FIA Jean Todt is a man who seems younger in comparison with Ecclestone but is someone who is firmly in his mid sixties and he recently succeeded a near seventy year old man called Max Mosley.  Most of the team Principals are well into their fifties perhaps with the exception of Christian Horner who is only in his thirties.  By F1 standards he is a babe in arms as yet since some of the drivers such as Michael Schumacher are older than him.  Older drivers are in big numbers in F1. Rubens Barrichello, Narain Karthikeyan, Nick Heidfeld, Jarno Trulli, Jenson Button and Felipe Massa are in their thirties.  The last two have only just made it there while the others are well entrenched there and Barichello and Trulli are getting to forty.  Then the likes of Fernando Alonso, Heikki Kovaleinen, Vitantonio Liuzzi and Adrian Sutil are almost there in their thirties.  With the exception of Alonso, Button and Massa the others are not in a position to justify their position on the F1 grid.  Jaime Alguersuari and Sebastian Buemi are the real youngsters.

Obviously when an ageing population is in control of things it is most akin to a gerontocracy and that is precisely the reason why Formula1 has become so near sighted.  All kinds of rubbish is promoted in the name of cost cutting and slowing the cars down so that it, F1 is safer.  At one time ribbed tyres were introduced to slow the cars down.  But nobody ever bothered to do something about the whole aerodynamics thingy in F1.  If you take a close look you will see that this reliance on aerodynamics is what brought trouble to F1 in a big way and is at the root of all the things cited so far.  Cars being too fast, lack of overtaking and high costs, all of them can be put down to the excessive involvement of aerodynamics.  It has been pointed out that we have reached a stage in F1 where we cannot do without aerodynamics.  We agree.  But there is a way of cutting the expenditure involved.

Presently most of aerodynamics requirement is taken care of by wind tunnels that have to run 24 hrs a day.  Please turn your attention to this team called Marussia Virgin Racing team.  Its technical director is a man who goes by the name of Nick Wirth and not only is he behind the disastrous showing of Marussia Virgin till date but also in the 1990s of a team called Simtek.  If you are wondering as to why we are invoking the name of a man who presides over disastrous teams here is the reason.  Nick Wirth believes that costs can be brought down radically by giving up the ghost of the wind tunnel.  He and Virgin have been using CFD or Computational Fluid Dynamics that does not require a wind tunnel but makes do with computers.  If you see the time difference over one lap between the fastest car and the Virgin cars, you would see that sometimes it is three seconds per lap but mostly in the two second region.

So why does not the FIA ban the usage of wind tunnels completely and ask the teams to rely on CFD alone?  The answer is simple.  Try telling  Luca Di Montezemolo or Adrian Newey or Ron Dennis this.  Di Montezemolo and Dennis will explode in anger because this means that their “heritage” as F1 greats will be compromised and they will be reduced to starting on par with the Marussia Virgins, the Team Lotuses etc.  Adrian Newey could lose his position as the genius behind winning cars and Mike Gascoyne could lose employment. Try convincing Patrick Head that this is the new way forward, he will pooh pooh the suggestion.  After all he is pushing seventy, so what else do you expect?  Despite the wide spread use of computational aids in various things including fluid dynamics (air is also a fluid), the older generation (put that as all over the age of fifty) are not fully familiar with the whole concept.

To draw a parallel, just think of the older people in offices that you work in.  How savvy are they with new technologies and how open are they to new ideas?  How near sighted are they?  How much are they sacrificing the future for the comfort of the present?  The same problem is what haunts F1 today.  Gerontocracies are enemies of the future.  The mindlessness that is so visible today is a result of everyone in power in F1 and FIA clinging on to their comfort zones.  This leads to piecemeal experimenting with things such as moveable front and rear wings, different engine capacities and most recently tyres.

The issue of Pirelli tyres is worth looking into.  They along with the moveable rear wing or the Drag Reduction System (DRS) have reduced F1 to a farce thus far this season.  When tyre wear dictates that race strategies cannot be firmly put in place there is the great equalizer of all things.  The DRS system has meant that there is no fun in racing because at any given point in the race, there are so many cars breezing past others only to find that once the car that they have overtaken on the previous lap is behind it can do the same to them this lap.

The justification for the tyres is that Pirelli is coming back into the sport after a long layoff going over twenty years.  Please recall the first season that Bridgestone came into in F1.  It was going up against Goodyear who had been there for a while.  From race one onwards, Bridgestone tyres were performing as well as the Goodyear tyres, sometimes better.  When Michelin came back they were able to compete straight away.  So why is Pirelli not able to do so? Is it an inferior company?  The answer is that Pirelli walked in as the sole supplier with no competition.  It earns a handsome amount of money but due to the lack of competition they are not forced to accelerate development and their head honcho will say stupid things such as “It is more difficult to make tyres that don’t last than it is to make tyres that last”.  Need we say anything here?

Let us face it, nothing will change in F1 for the better with these half baked and ill thought out measures.  Even the new engine formula of four cylinder, turbo charged engines of 1600cc will not serve any constructive purpose.  This is a measure to bring manufacturers such as Volkswagen into F1, since VW has been talking about a World Engine of these specifications.  VW wants to make one engine that fits all, F1, World Rally Championship (WRC), World Touring Car Championship (WTCC) and anything else you can think of.  Should F1 be dictated by these considerations?  To hell with the manufacturers, let the teams make their own engines.  Remember the Arrows team that made its own engines and also engines for the MotoGP project of Team Roberts?  There are enough engine designers and consultants that the teams can use to make their own engines.  Let us face it, for F1 to succeed we need a paradigm shift.  Nothing less will do.  Bring in young people and let them find refreshing and new ways of doing things.  Till then F1 will be this, a pale shadow of what it once was.

For years now Formula1 has been called the pinnacle of all motor racing.  People have said that it represents cutting edge technology that ultimately finds its way into road going cars. There are enough cliches about how racing improves the breed and the motor sport loving public loves to hear this and buy all this without nary a question being raised.  Let us then start considering the veracity of these claims.  First, Formula1 is the pinnacle of all motor racing.  Is that really true?  We think not.  Here are the reasons.  Till last year, it could be argued without fear of contradiction, that Formula1 was one of the most boring forms of motor racing, it probably was the most boring.  People have fallen asleep in front of their TV sets and even those who have been to circuit may have done so.  It is usually a procession of cars with positions changing just a little during pit stops and coming back to what they were, once all the cars finished their rounds of pit stops.  Only a mistake in the pits or one on the pit wall saw any change in terms of positions.  Last year all the excitement towards the end of the season was due to some bad management of all kinds by Ferrari, leading to Sebastian Vettel winning the World Championship.  Otherwise, apart from Fernando Alonso asking his team mate be moved aside there was nothing else noteworthy (even this was noteworthy for the wrong reasons obviously),  and there was not much in terms of pure racing on the track.  Incidents such as Fernando Alonso’s request and Michael Schumacher’s in the past where he wanted no team mate of his to win a race have not contributed to this pinnacle of motor racing thing.  Espionage is another thing.  McLaren stealing Ferrari material and Renault stealing McLaren material and Renault asking Nelson Piquet Jr to crash his car deliberately undermined all claims of fairness and also that of top quality racing.

Now to come to the second point.  Formula1 represents cutting edge technology that will later find its way into road going cars.  While this may have been true very many years ago, it is now nothing but a bare faced lie.  Present day Formula1 does not represent any cutting edge technology.  Can you remember anything that was in the nature of innovation in the recent past? Today F1 rules clearly stipulate how many cylinders can be used, what metals and composites to use, why it even dictates the angle of the cylinders and size of the intakes, so what is the cutting edge technology we are talking about?  KERS (Kinetic Energy Recovery System) is supposed to be environmental friendly.  Humph, environmental friendly indeed.  The system uses batteries that increase the weight of the car and make it guzzle more petrol and what of the disposal of dead batteries?  Send them to another planet or to the moon?  This is hypocrisy at its best.  Anyway, much before KERS happened in Formula1 road going cars have been using this system in various forms.  Remember the Toyota Prius?  Even the Volkswagen Passat BlueMotion uses regenerative braking and both these manufacturers are not in F1 (Toyota left a few years ago and VW never was in it).  So you can have nothing to do with F1 and still have cutting edge technology simply because F1 technology is not cutting edge.  It has been blunted long ago. Anyway this “green” thing is complete horse rubbish and we have said so in another piece preceding this.  And what of the “new”engine formula for 2013 and onwards?  Four cylinder, turbocharged and 1600cc displacement.  Need we say more?

So that is two claims down and out and one more to go.  Racing improves the breed.  Really? What breed does it improve.  Formula1 racing is completely dependent on aerodynamics today; aerodynamics that have very little relevance to anything other Formula1.  Teams spend millions of dollars in wind tunnels, sometimes only to get wrong figures like it happened with Honda in 2007 and with Ferrari for this year’s car.  Why talk this garbage then?  Why are teams pouring money into something that is no better than anything else just to say, our cars are more aerodynamic.  Right now in F1 Adrian Newey is the star.  We would like to see drivers’ abilities determine who wins and who loses.  This year the racing is spiced up due to Pirelli still learning to make durable tyres and due to the Drag Reduction System which can only be used at designated points on circuits.  Does racing have to be made interesting artificially?  Should we buy Ecclestone’s argument that sprinklers should create rain like situations to make racing interesting?  Of what interest is this kind of racing which needs props to make it interesting?

The problem with F1 is that first it is motivated by greed and avarice (remember Kimi Raikonnen and Bernie Ecclestone, just to name two from potentially a thousand) and that pushes costs up and brings down the quality of racing.  So let us not talk balderdash and get down to really uncomplicated racing.  Let there be no restrictions on engine innovations but ration petrol like they do in MotoGP, banish aerodynamics completely and seek pure mechanical grip and make racing interesting.  No need for KERS, DRS and all other hogwash.  Let it be that talent dictates who wins and loses and not some garbled notions like they do today.  And if you are thinking that we are saying that racing does not need to have anything to do with road going cars, you are absolutely right.  Let car companies use separate R&D for road cars depending on the requirements determined by different roads and markets.  Don’t make racing hycritical.  There is enough of that in this world.  So keep it straight and honest.

You can treat this as an extension of the rant against the Greens that was posted on these pages yesterday.  Riot Engine is the brain child of auto enthusiasts and the “brain” bit is being used wisely here.  While we are passionate about automobilia we are not blinded by it.  We are fully aware that automobile engines run on fossil fuels and due to the inefficiency of the internal combustion engine there is environmental pollution.  But when many people think and say that motorsport is a waste of money and precious resource (fossil fuels are likely to run out sometime) and adding to environmental pollution we beg to differ.  This needs an explanation.  If motorsport is a waste of money and fuel resource so are football and cricket.

This is not comparing chalk with cheese.  Please take a look at just one tournament in cricket called the Indian Premier League.  For nearly 60 days the tournament uses up huge quantities of electricity to provide lighting so that people can return from work and watch cricket matches in the evening for three hours like they would a movie.  Now this is not our take on T20 cricket.  This is what the disgraced Commissioner of the IPL, Lalit Modi said himself.  This is happening in the summer when in the month of April farmers in the southern part of the country and most parts of India require additional power for their Rabi crop.  Mr. Gill, our beloved sports minister said Formula1 racing and all other forms of motor racing were not a sport and that they fell into the category of entertainment.  So what does IPL with its film star owned teams and expensive opening ceremonies and gyrating cheer leaders become?  If we were to believe Mr. Modi, it is entertainment.  This year the Cricket World Cup also saw its share of entertainment with things happening during and before the start of cricket matches.  Most of the matches were played under flood lights.  And what of the obscene amounts of money that are being paid to cricketers as salary? This happens not just in India but in all parts of the cricketing world such as Australia, England and the West Indies.

Enough of cricket, lets now see what football does.  For nearly a year, the Barclay’s English Premier League alone has matches in hundreds of numbers, most again played in the evening under lights.  You can hear on TV the singing of songs through out the match by the spectating public.  Is this not contributing to pollution and is this not entertainment? Again like the English Premier League in England, you have a huge Spanish La Liga, the German Bundes Liga, the Italian Serie A, the Dutch, the Swedish, the Scottish, the Welsh, the Danish and innumerable other leagues in the South American continent, many of which use flood lights and burn up precious fuel reserves and contribute to environmental pollution since in most instances fossil fuels are used for electricity.  We have not even talked about what the Americans do with their brand of football, grid iron, basket ball, ice hockey, ice skating (on rinks that are artificially created by using electricity), and tennis.

Now ask yourself do you require offices that run airconditioning through out the year, even in winter?  Do you require centralized heating of houses and offices ?  Do you require to sit in front of computers and play stupid games on Facebook or play internet based games?  Do you require shopping malls that are centrally airconditioned?  Do you require high rise buildings in the construction of which so much electricity is used?  Let us face it, we are a civilization that believes in excesses and when we do this, why single out motorsport as an unnecessary luxury and a waste of fuel resource and a source of pollution and a waste of money and that which does not serve any purpose? Of what use are football, cricket, tennis, hockey and any other sport or game you can think of?

What is apalling is that motorsport managers and motor vehicle industry personnel feel they have to be politically correct and please everybody including the Greens and the time passing socialite glitterati who like to make stupid political statements by driving around in a Toyota Prius and brag that they are saving the environment.  Car and bike companies want to sell their products and so will not want to alienate anyone, but in trying to be all things to all people they are likely to end up being nothing to anyone.  This attitude makes motor sport almost a guilty pleasure.  We say it need not be.  So why don’t all motor sport fans and people passionate about automobiles just stand up and say they love the smell of the internal combustion engine burning petrol or diesel and that they also love watching those mad men risking life and limb to drive and ride spectacularly around?  Come on now, let us say that we will ask for the stopping of motor sport and other automobile “excesses” when the world announces its intention to stop all other excesses.  Till then let there be cars, bikes, rallies and races.  Have fun, don’t feel guilty and stand up to that Green who tells you that you are against the environment.

The great Aldous Huxley wrote about this thing called “The Brave New World” where there will be some one to take care of all of us and where life would be secure and free.  The Brave New World is the ultimate Utopia one that Huxley carefully put out to let the Western Civilization know its stupidities in thinking that it can control the destiny of this world.  There have been many optimists who turned into cynics once they came to realize the idiocy of believing that somehow we are in control of ourselves and our destinies.  One such person is George Orwell and another being Arthur Koestler.  Orwell in his now celebrated book 1984 portrayed a bleak vision of a world taken over by the State which in turn is controlled by power hungry control freaks.  The expressions Newspeak and Big Brother came into being in this work.  Ironically Big Brother the TV show found its inspiration here. For motor racing fans newspeak is better known as Ronspeak an allusion to Ron Dennis who mastered the art of saying a lot without saying anything at all in effect.   We digress here.  To get back to the point about Western Civilization, its attitude is best exemplified by Allopathy in medicine where the humble doctor believes he can control the destiny of his patient.  For years now this form of medicine has been saying prevention is better than cure and prescribing preventions that have neither prevented or cured complex diseases.  Chemotherapy for cancer patients is an outstanding example of this.

If we are to understand the Western obsession with controlling things we have to go back to the Reformation which unleashed the Protestant Ethic.  The Protestant Ethic nearly created a Godless world which broke the human being’s already tenuous links with the rest of the Universe and leading him to believe that nature can be manipulated in order to satisfy the ever increasing greed of the human race.  The scientific method and the industrial revolution unleashed an unprecedented rapacious consumption that led to the emergence of things such as chemical waste and environmental degradation.  Nature has been programmed (by whoever) to not have anything that goes waste.  But the new civilization unleashed toxins that have started destroying soils, ambient air and even the ozone layer.  So the Western Civilization wakes up to “control” this process as well.  But there is a slight problem here.

Colonialism which started four hundred years ago took Western practices and beliefs to all parts of the world and strenuously worked to replace other systems of thought.  Capitalism took consumerism and consumption to new levels by “opening” new markets and encouraging the locals into greater consumption.  While capitalism grew intrinsically from within Western Civilization, thereby giving scope for better planning and a possibility  of problem fixing, it went into other parts as an import. The Western impatience to introduce new products and exploit market potentials meant that in most instances first the products were introduced and then planning took place.  The same is the case with the auto industry, the thing of consequence for this website.

In most parts of the world the auto industry went into a market where there were takers for products of independent self mobility but with little infrastructure to support that.  The Indian scenario is the epitome of this.  Too many people, too many vehicles, no traffic sense, no sense of cost of life and no proper public transport.  So when the Green brigade in India (yes, Green Peace is here and how) starts parrotting what their Western counter parts are saying, they are saying things which are completely irrelevant here.  Like in the West, automobiles are a ready and soft target.  While no attempts are made to cut down on airconditioning and heating at homes and offices which demand big consumption of electricity, the Greens want the automobile industry to encourage electric cars.  To find electricity for all these cars, there will be additional pressure on electricity grinds which already burn copious amounts of fossil fuels and unleash environmental pollution.

When this point was brought to the notice of the Green brigade they have started attacking power consumption as well with idiotic calls for Earth hours which nobody with any sense follows.  The Greens also attack nuclear energy and cite instances such as Chernobyl nuclear reactor melt down and the latest Fukushima incident. There is a point there, but try telling that to people who only just started to find wealth and the ways in which to spend it on luxuries.  So rapacious consumption is now a global phenomenon and the non-Western parts of the world have told the West that it was not correct for them to have enjoyed everything and now deny that to the rest of the world.  In countries such as ours where we do not value life anyway the babble of the Greens is just that.  But even in the context of the Western world do the Greens actually believe that they can create these urban Utopias with clean air and no sound thanks to non polluting vehicles?  Are they really so naive that they cannot see the futility of this exercise?  Isn’t it akin to the carnivore who advocates compassion towards all life forms and animal welfare by choosing certain animals, such as dogs and cats only to fit into that ambit?  You decide as to how you will characterize what the Greens are doing.

Riot Engine caught Nissan’s Global Sedan, known as the Sunny in China, testing in Chennai. The Teana-ish grill and the Micra-ish central console were definitely working against the camouflage, minimal as it may have been.

That isn’t livery, just us going overboard with the watermarking!

The car looks real good in flesh, but that might just be the grey color working its magic. Contrary to some pictures that surfaced on the web of the Sunny in thailand, with black interiors, this one had a fully beige interior. The funky central console, as seen in the Micra was  finished in the usual dull aluminium, and was just as funky as it’s always been. The seats appear to be well bolstered relative to what the Micra has to offer.

The passengers at the rear get two AC vents, one stacked on top of the other. If the car is priced between Rs. 4.85 and Rs. 6.10lakh, as speculated in various automotive websites, then expect the DZire and Manza to have something to worry about. The Etios? With a prefix like ‘Toyota’ and the average Indian car buyer who places more trust in Toyota than on God, we’re sure the Etios will be in demand for some time. We expect the Nissan to put up a good fight though, considering it is the better looking car amongst its peers.